Addressing PEAK TORQUE and his TAVELO AROW Frame Video

Addressing PEAK TORQUE and his TAVELO AROW Frame Video with GC Performance


Source: GC Performance Youtube Channel: Addressing PEAK TORQUE and his TAVELO AROW Frame Video

Video Addressing PEAK TORQUE and his TAVELO AROW Frame Video with GC Performance

Video Addressing PEAK TORQUE and his TAVELO AROW Frame Video with GC Performance YouTube Channel.

Addressing PEAK TORQUE and his TAVELO AROW Frame Video

The recent controversy surrounding the Tavella Arrow bike has sparked a lot of discussions within the cycling community. As a long-time cyclist and bike shop owner, I feel compelled to share my own experience with the Tavella Arrow, especially in light of the criticisms raised by other YouTubers like Peak Torque. While I understand the importance of quality control in the bike industry, I also want to provide a balanced perspective on the matter.

First and foremost, let’s address the issue of the undersized bottom bracket. After inspecting my own Tavella Arrow, I found that the bottom bracket was indeed undersized, measuring around 40.86mm to 40.94mm. While this may not meet the industry-standard specifications, I have to admit that it did not significantly impact my riding experience. I was still able to ride the bike comfortably and without any noticeable issues. However, it is important to note that an undersized bottom bracket may require more frequent replacement and maintenance in the long run.

Moving on to other concerns raised by Peak Torque, such as the handlebar flex and headset issues, I found that my experience differed. The handlebar on my Tavella Arrow exhibited some flex, but this could be attributed to design choices aimed at providing comfort to riders. Similarly, the headset and steer plug functioned as intended, with no binding or rubbing issues during my rides. While Peak Torque’s feedback is valid based on his own experience, it is essential to consider that individual variations and preferences can influence perception.

In terms of the seat post and seat clamp, I did not encounter any issues with mine. The seat post slid in and out smoothly, and the seat clamp functioned as expected. It is worth noting that differences in paint finish or material could potentially contribute to variations in performance, as seen in Peak Torque’s case. However, it is essential to address these issues directly with the manufacturer for resolution.

Overall, my experience with the Tavella Arrow has been positive. While I acknowledge the importance of quality control and attention to detail in bike manufacturing, I also believe that individual experiences may vary. As a cyclist and bike shop owner, I aim to provide honest and unbiased feedback to help others make informed decisions about their cycling gear. In the end, it is up to the consumer to weigh the pros and cons of each product and make a decision based on their personal preferences and requirements.

In conclusion, the Tavella Arrow bike offers a compelling option for riders looking for a high-performance race bike at a reasonable price point. While there may be some quality control issues to consider, my overall experience with the bike has been positive. As with any purchase, it is essential to do thorough research and consider all factors before making a decision. I hope this insight into my experience with the Tavella Arrow has been helpful and informative for fellow cyclists and enthusiasts. Thank you for reading.


The opinions expressed in this space are the sole responsibility of the YouTube Channel GC Performance and do not necessarily represent the views of CicloNews.